I used to have the Tamron 16-50/2.8 on my Nikon DSLRs and the color was very "un-Nikon". I ended up selling it and picking up a used Nikkor 17-55/2.8 which I was a lot happier with. The 16-55/2.8 was my first purchase when I switched to Fuji, and it doesn't disappoint. Yeah before preordering the X-H1, I considered this. But then aside from the A7III body, I then considered the lenses I have over the last few years as a fuji user ---XF 10-24 f4 XF 16-55 f2.8 XF 23 f1.4 XF 35 f1.4 XF 56 f1.2 XF 50-140 f2.8--- and the thousands additional on top of the A7III I'd have to pay to replace them with FE equivalents. This review has just been added and I have to say the results are somewhat underwhelming. Resolution is very close to the 18-55mm at similar focus lengths and apertures. My experience suggests the 16-55mm is noticeably sharper, but this may be down to differences in micro-contrast and rendering. I had the pleasure of using the XF 16-55mm f/2.8 lens for several months after it was launched and I was able to take it with me on several projects and assignments, so this review is primarily based on my field experience. Let’s take a look at the lens in more detail. The Fuji 16-55mm f/2.8 at 16mm f/2.8 The 16-55mm f/2.8 is the only lens of the three I actually own. It is a grand lens, a versatile shooter with a 24-82.5mm focal range in full-frame talk. Sigma has just released the outstanding 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN in Fujifilm's X-Mount, so we just had to shoot it out against the revered Fujinon XF 18-55mm F2.8- Vay Tiền Nhanh Chỉ Cần Cmnd Nợ Xấu.

fuji 16 55 f2 8 review